Saṁyutta Nikāya:
III. Khandhā Vagga:
22: Khandhāsaṁyutta

Sakkāya-Diṭṭhi Suttaṁ

Sutta 157

Dependence (2)

 

---

 

Thus have I heard:

The Exalted One was once staying near Sāvatthī
at the Jeta Grove in Anāthapiṇḍika's Park.

And there the Exalted One addressed the brethren, saying:

"Brethren!"

"Master!" responded those brethren.

The Exalted One said:

"There being what, brethren,
by clinging to what,
depending upon what,
does attachment to the bondage
of dependence upon the fetters arise?"

"For us, lord, things have the Exalted One as their root
their guide,
their resort.

Well indeed if the meaning of these words
should show itself in the Exalted One."

■

"There being a body, brethren,
by clinging to body,
depending on body,
attachment to the bondage
of dependence upon the fetters arises.

"There being feeling, brethren,
by clinging to feeling,
depending on feeling,
bondage of,
dependence upon the fetters arises.

"There being perception, brethren,
by clinging to perception,
depending on perception,
attachment to the bondage
of dependence upon the fetters arises.

"There being the activities, brethren,
by clinging to the activities,
depending on the activities,
attachment to the bondage
of dependence upon the fetters arises.

"There being consciousness, brethren,
by clinging to consciousness,
depending on consciousness,
attachment to the bondage
of dependence upon the fetters arises.

■

As to that, what think ye, brethren?

Is body permanent or impermanent?"

"Impermanent, lord."

"That which is impermanent,
is it weal or woe?"

"Woe, lord."

"Then without a clinging
to what is impermanent,
woeful,
by nature changeable,
could attachment to the bondage
of dependence upon the fetters arise?"

"Surely not, lord."

■

"Is feeling permanent or impermanent?"

"Impermanent, lord."

"That which is impermanent,
is it weal or woe?"

"Woe, lord."

"Then without a clinging
to what is impermanent,
woeful,
by nature changeable,
could attachment to the bondage
of dependence upon the fetters arise?"

"Surely not, lord."

■

"Is perception permanent or impermanent?"

"Impermanent, lord."

"That which is impermanent,
is it weal or woe?"

"Woe, lord."

"Then without a clinging
to what is impermanent,
woeful,
by nature changeable,
could attachment to the bondage
of dependence upon the fetters arise?"

"Surely not, lord."

■

"Are the activities permanent or impermanent?"

"Impermanent, lord."

"That which is impermanent,
is it weal or woe?"

"Woe, lord."

"Then without a clinging
to what is impermanent,
woeful,
by nature changeable,
could attachment to the bondage
of dependence upon the fetters arise?"

"Surely not, lord."

■

"Is consciousness permanent or impermanent?"

"Impermanent, lord."

"That which is impermanent,
is it weal or woe?"

"Woe, lord."

"Then without a clinging
to what is impermanent,
woeful,
by nature changeable,
could attachment to the bondage
of dependence upon the fetters arise?"

"Surely not, lord."

 

---

 

"Wherefore, brethren, he who thus sees
conceives disgust at body,
at feeling,
at perception,
at the activities,
at consciousness.

Being disgusted
he is repelled by them;
by that repulsion he is released;
by that release he is set free;
knowledge arises:
in the freed man is the freed thing,
and he knows:

"Destroyed is rebirth;
lived is the righteous life;
done is the task;
for life in these conditions
there is no hereafter."